Art: Ginny, Snape, and more Snape (all G)
Wednesday, 14 March 2007 02:08 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I did a few pictures last weekend, trying out my new (and tiny) box of watercolours. It's a Cotman set - that is, the cheap line of Winsor & Newton. The main difference seems to be that these paints are made with substitutes for some of the more expensive pigments. My watercolour handbook strongly advised against buying anything that is not the professional standard, but I thought I should get a feel for watercolour first, and I always feel guilty when I make a mess with what is essentially very good material :/.
sscrewdriver warned me that the cheaper watercolour paints are usually less transparent than the expensive ones. Because I haven't any real comparison, I guess this is something I may see with my own eyes in the future, when I am confident enough to start using the Winsor & Newton set that is as yet stashed in my cupboard... The only thing I can say so far is that I do see a difference with my (even cheaper) watercolour pencils. The pencils' pigments appear to my untutored eye more luminous than the Cotman set's (?). But to be honest, I don't think the paint is to blame for anything that went wrong with my pictures - it might just be my lack of skill :P.
Anyway: my recent exploits are below.

I guess this is just less good a picture than "A Scarlet Ribbon" was, but I do think the skin tones I used for Eileen were really more luminous and transparent than those I got out of my Cotman set... Hm.
I'm not too happy with this picture, for some reason. Part of it is that I think I set the eyes off too much. It seems I will really have to make a choice between my comics-like style and realism, because I feel uneasy about the combination that I get here.

Again, mixed feelings about this. I dropped all attempts at realism and using the paint as anything more than just colour. All the colours are of my own making, except for the Cadmium Red of Ginny's hair and the Burnt Umber of her shoes. Unfortunately I don't think I did a very good job :/. Also, the skirt's folds aren't particularly well-done.

This was fun. I do adore my marten and petit-gris brushes; this was an improvisation with them, drawn directly with paint. All went well as long as I stayed with the Snape figure. Then I had to cook up a background, and I think it is quite obvious that I hadn't given it any thought :P. I drew a tree, but it looked stupid, so I covered it with broad brush strokes, but you can still see some of it, and the result isn't particularly clever or good either *g*. Ah well. I enjoyed myself, and I do like the hues.
...I really should take classes, shouldn't I? But I have no time at present, and I can't keep myself from pottering around until I do...
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Anyway: my recent exploits are below.
I guess this is just less good a picture than "A Scarlet Ribbon" was, but I do think the skin tones I used for Eileen were really more luminous and transparent than those I got out of my Cotman set... Hm.
I'm not too happy with this picture, for some reason. Part of it is that I think I set the eyes off too much. It seems I will really have to make a choice between my comics-like style and realism, because I feel uneasy about the combination that I get here.
Again, mixed feelings about this. I dropped all attempts at realism and using the paint as anything more than just colour. All the colours are of my own making, except for the Cadmium Red of Ginny's hair and the Burnt Umber of her shoes. Unfortunately I don't think I did a very good job :/. Also, the skirt's folds aren't particularly well-done.
This was fun. I do adore my marten and petit-gris brushes; this was an improvisation with them, drawn directly with paint. All went well as long as I stayed with the Snape figure. Then I had to cook up a background, and I think it is quite obvious that I hadn't given it any thought :P. I drew a tree, but it looked stupid, so I covered it with broad brush strokes, but you can still see some of it, and the result isn't particularly clever or good either *g*. Ah well. I enjoyed myself, and I do like the hues.
...I really should take classes, shouldn't I? But I have no time at present, and I can't keep myself from pottering around until I do...
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 02:06 pm (UTC)That's what I said when I saw Snape's portrait.
Fantastic work
Why does Ginny look so sour? Has Molly finally come to her senses and forbiade her from seeing the (as SIW says) scar-headed prat? LOL
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 10:40 am (UTC)*g*
Well, Ginny... something happened when I transfered the drawing to the watercolour paper. In the original pencil picture she had a cheeky little smile; then when I was ready with the paints, I suddenly noticed that the smile had gone! I had been to focused on the paint that I hadn't noticed. So, um, it's an accident... :)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 02:13 pm (UTC)1) Gah. I actually like the comic like style. What really kills me is the brushstroke that is his shoulder.
2) Love the colours and her stockings.
3) The figure of Snape is well done and I like the cloak.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 10:46 am (UTC)The brushstroke for Snape's shoulder in the first picture is something that was impossible to do until I had my new brushes - the old synthetic ones just wouldn't hold enough paint for something like that. Now I have two petit-gris brushes; they are brilliant! The cloak in the last picture is also due to the petit-gris.
Ginny was of course merely an excuse for painting red-and-white stockings ;).
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 02:56 pm (UTC)I also like the comics style in the first one. I think it works really well! I love the top of the hair, the way you left it without pigment. I am bad about not leaving those areas, so I love to see people use them well!
Ginny's expression in the second is great. I also like her stockings quite a bit, as they remind me of the Wicked Witch of the West. lol
The white area between Snape and the background in the third draws my eye to him immediately. I love that contrast! You really use negative space so well.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:59 pm (UTC)I was more or less forced to draw Ginny as I could hardly give Snape red-and-white stockings ;)... It was good to try new colours too.
Thank you!
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:46 pm (UTC)Thank you!
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 03:31 pm (UTC)I like these; especially the last picture attracts: I love the different layers of black, how it fades and gets more and more translucent until it meets whiteness. The lines around the moon implying skies are all very well done. Lovely work.
Ps. http://www.artchive.com/artchive/ftptoc/turner_ext.html
Am I right you love 1800-1900 century paintings? This one is one of my favourites, and he does both oil and watercolours. Large versions of his paintings are at the bottom of the page (just click on the painting's titles and they will appear).
Hope to see more watercolour paintings from you. :)
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:45 pm (UTC)The last picture could only be what it is because of the petit-gris brush. Squirrel hair can absorb a large amount of water and releases it slowly onto the paper; that way, you get the wonderful effect of fading. I'm so happy I bought one of those! It makes such a difference.
Thank you! :)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 03:55 pm (UTC)About the second Snape I particularly that both this hair and his cloak taper off so that they almost become part of the background.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:38 pm (UTC)As for the colours of the face, I found it difficult to decide whether to make them blur into each other or not... I softened a few edges, but I left most because my art is never very realistic, and it might look a little off. Realism has never been an aim in any case :).
Glad you like it!
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:32 pm (UTC)Snape and darkness never stop fascinating me. I should like to try more with washes, now that paint allows me several effects that I couldn't create with lines. It's fun! And your interpretation is delightful :).
As for the portrait, I still have to come to terms with seeing Snape in such colours :D. It's strange to me *g*.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 05:13 pm (UTC)but I'm really not an expert in such things. :(
I just hope you can find what you're searching for.
the pictures look awesome as always to me :)
love your comic-style in #1 and the colours you use!
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:21 pm (UTC)Meanwhile it's just fun, even though a little frustrating at times...
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 05:23 pm (UTC)My son (Kid A) sends his love. He liked the pictures too. (He's in my lap right now and wanted to be included in what I was typing!)
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:19 pm (UTC)I've been thinking that perhaps I should try adding a little gum arabic to the paint; that might make it more transparent... I'm already happy that I can mix decent skin tones - I remember that being a constant problem in the past, when my people would always look plain pink or orange :P. The trick to achieve sallowness is to add some pale yellow to the usual skin mix.
I think that in paint, skin tones always have to be mixed. For the rest, I really like the colours unmixed - I don't think mine usually look quite as beautiful as the pure stuff from the paint box. But
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:05 pm (UTC)Why, thank you :D!
(Mwuahahahaaa! Evil mission accomplished!)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:02 pm (UTC)I'm not sure - I suppose I just have to get used to seeing my Snape in colour. Maybe it just makes him too real ;)?
I'm very glad you like them :).
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 09:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 12:58 pm (UTC)It's like two very different approaches... Pictures of the Ginny kind are fuelled by colour, and I do love colour. But there will always be something about monochrome and simple shapes that somehow I like even better. :)
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 02:03 pm (UTC)I really love the coloring with that one, esp. the awesome stockings. The Snapes are both gorgeous, imho, but the second really appeals to me. It makes me wonder what he's up to.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 02:12 pm (UTC)It's always good to wonder what Snape is up to, I think *g*.
Thank you! :)
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 03:28 pm (UTC)But, seriously, the green does look nice--it works well with the rest of the coloring, and those eyes just seem to fit her personality. I like them!
*Gazes adoringly at Snape once more*
no subject
Date: Sunday, 18 March 2007 09:04 pm (UTC)(Look,
no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 15 March 2007 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Friday, 16 March 2007 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 18 March 2007 09:05 pm (UTC)I'm not sure how real I want Snape to look :P. He scares me!
no subject
Date: Monday, 19 March 2007 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 19 March 2007 12:28 pm (UTC)I think I will always like blacks and greys best... The third painting is of course entirely in "lamp black" *g* - it wasn't in my box, so I had to buy it separately, and it was only then that I understood your username :D (I'm a pigment ignoramus, but working on it).
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 March 2007 02:27 am (UTC)