![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Art: The Beautiful Narcissa (G)
I predict that this week will be full of art posts :-). You can expect ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
seaislewitch's second picture, as well as the full images and sketches of my two submissions to ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
romancingwizard's latest challenge - and today you get my most recent experiment with watercolour pencils, courtesy of sscrewdriver and what seemed at first to be a bad buy :D.
Do I love the twenties? I love the twenties! This was inspired by charleston-age fashion plates without being based on any particular one.
I know it's not spectacular, but I had been longing to do a very simple picture after having drawn a series of fairly complex ones (in my terms). The original idea - one which may as yet produce a result of its own - was to go for a simple, two-dimensional black and white lineart with large black areas, but then this bad buy happened, all because ofsscrewdriver ;-).
I am supposed to do a picture for her with ecoline colouring, which requires heavier paper than I possessed in A4 size, and I had been planning to get me some A4 watercolour paper anyway. However, my Remus and Tonks experiment has taught me something: all those brands of watercolour paper have different grains, even when they all state the grain is 'fine'. The coarser kind of paper give me trouble when transferring my pencil lineart onto it, plus the pencils leave a lot more pigment on the page than I think they do, which means I find myself incapable of controlling the mixture of the colours, a fact that is problematic for the skin tones among other things. So, after having used Cotman paper for my Christmas cards and Bockingford for Tonks and Lupin, I know that what Bockingford calls 'fine grain' isn't nearly as fine as Cotman's paper with the same label. Unfortunately, though, I couldn't find Cotman paper in a larger size. The trouble begins when you realise that the blocs of watercolour paper in the shop are all neatly wrapped in plastic: you can't see what the surface of the paper is like! So I gambled and bought some that I thought would be fine, only to unwrap it at home and discover that the grain is much courser than anything I have so far. Joy. In fact, the paper is even sort of vertically lined. Go me! It is totally impossible to do my regular lineart on this stuff, let alone transfer my pencils onto it.
But as usual when I buy something that doesn't turn out what it was meant to be, I felt the urge to prove that I could do something with it after all :D. I made what was frankly a very quick and spontaneous drawing in pencil, then inked it very loosely with my smallest Staedtler pen (005). Because this time I could anticipate the colour mixing problem, I used a bit of paper as a palette and mixed the skin tones there. As for the grey of the dress, I thought I would make use of the lines in the paper to suggest peplos-like folds - I was thinking of Fortuny's 'Delphos' evening dresses (mmmmm....).
So - well, here it is.
And I'm going back to the shop to take another stab at getting smooth watercolour paper :P.
seaislewitch's second picture, as well as the full images and sketches of my two submissions to romancingwizard's latest challenge - and today you get my most recent experiment with watercolour pencils, courtesy of sscrewdriver and what seemed at first to be a bad buy :D.Do I love the twenties? I love the twenties! This was inspired by charleston-age fashion plates without being based on any particular one.
I know it's not spectacular, but I had been longing to do a very simple picture after having drawn a series of fairly complex ones (in my terms). The original idea - one which may as yet produce a result of its own - was to go for a simple, two-dimensional black and white lineart with large black areas, but then this bad buy happened, all because of
sscrewdriver ;-). I am supposed to do a picture for her with ecoline colouring, which requires heavier paper than I possessed in A4 size, and I had been planning to get me some A4 watercolour paper anyway. However, my Remus and Tonks experiment has taught me something: all those brands of watercolour paper have different grains, even when they all state the grain is 'fine'. The coarser kind of paper give me trouble when transferring my pencil lineart onto it, plus the pencils leave a lot more pigment on the page than I think they do, which means I find myself incapable of controlling the mixture of the colours, a fact that is problematic for the skin tones among other things. So, after having used Cotman paper for my Christmas cards and Bockingford for Tonks and Lupin, I know that what Bockingford calls 'fine grain' isn't nearly as fine as Cotman's paper with the same label. Unfortunately, though, I couldn't find Cotman paper in a larger size. The trouble begins when you realise that the blocs of watercolour paper in the shop are all neatly wrapped in plastic: you can't see what the surface of the paper is like! So I gambled and bought some that I thought would be fine, only to unwrap it at home and discover that the grain is much courser than anything I have so far. Joy. In fact, the paper is even sort of vertically lined. Go me! It is totally impossible to do my regular lineart on this stuff, let alone transfer my pencils onto it.
But as usual when I buy something that doesn't turn out what it was meant to be, I felt the urge to prove that I could do something with it after all :D. I made what was frankly a very quick and spontaneous drawing in pencil, then inked it very loosely with my smallest Staedtler pen (005). Because this time I could anticipate the colour mixing problem, I used a bit of paper as a palette and mixed the skin tones there. As for the grey of the dress, I thought I would make use of the lines in the paper to suggest peplos-like folds - I was thinking of Fortuny's 'Delphos' evening dresses (mmmmm....).
So - well, here it is.
And I'm going back to the shop to take another stab at getting smooth watercolour paper :P.
no subject
no subject
Thank you!
no subject
no subject
I love lettering tout court; I'm an amateur calligrapher who likes to think that 'writing beautifully' doesn't require special pen nibs ;). I try to do it always and with any means!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*grins*
I like this sort of art as well.
no subject
:D
Thank you!
no subject
no subject
Thank you!
no subject
no subject
no subject
Smooth watercolour paper is really hard to find, because most watercolour artists prefer something with a 'tooth' to catch the pigment. I had a really informative discussion with SuseDolAmroth on DevArt about this. She is an amazing watercolour artist and knows loads of useful tips.
I find if I want a smooth paper, I look for something that says 'suitable for pen and ink and light wash' instead of normal watercolour paper.
But, yes you can do really amazing things with rough watercolour paper - paint effects that aren't possible on anything else, like wet-on-wet techniques.
no subject
You couldn't, um, give me some tips about brushes, incidentally, could you :-)? I am so finding out things bit by bit - first there was the differences in effect with different textures of paper; now I'm realising what a nuisance my cheap synthetic brushes are. They release the water and/or paint all in one go, which is blech. Only, even once I have decided to buy some natural hair brushes, there is so much choice of brands and shapes and kinds of animal hair that I'm panicking XD.
Ah me.
- As for the smoother paper, I may have found something... It's paper of only 200 g per square meter, so it will wrinkle more easily, but since I don't really use washes (yet), that shouldn't be too much of a problem. Next time I go to the shop, that paper is miiiiine! Tonks will like it :-).
no subject
I tend to buy my brushes on sale. They're so expensive! Like, £6 each!
no subject
And you are a far braver soul than I to go foward into the unfamiliar and unpredictable territory of watercolor. I've always admired a skillful watercolor piece because I know I don't have the patience or the ability to pull it off myself. It's such an unforiving medium. Mistakes are very difficult to hide or correct (which is something I definitely need to be able to do).
I applaud you!
no subject
;P
It's colour, though. And I really, really want to learn about colour.
no subject
no subject
I never manage to keep my own feelings about the whole Christmas thing out of it, do I? It makes the cards fun for me though :D.
So happy it arrived in time! I was a bit nervous about that :-).
no subject
no subject
no subject
Very nice Sigune! I'd love to go to the party she's attending, but alas! I am Muggle-born.
no subject
Thank you!
You can come to my party, though *g*.
no subject
And mmm, that website you link to for the Delphos dress has got some gorgeous things on...
no subject
*drools*
Glad you like it! :)